Next: Using digital signatures
Up: Cooperative approaches
Previous: Click-through acknowledgements
One drawback of all our previous schemes is that while they enable a
referrer to detect hit shaving, they do not arm the referrer with any
evidence to present to a third party in the case of a dispute. So, in
the extreme, the webmaster of site B can repudiate some or all
referrals, including any acknowledgements it sent, and refuse to pay
certain referrers. While these referrers are thus likely to leave
B's click-through program, there is nothing that they can do to
bring third-party leverage on the dispute. In this section we extend
the technique in Section 4.1 to enable B
to pass nonrepudiable acknowledgements to the referrer. Again, any
failure of B to cooperate is quickly detectable by the referring
site A (if combined with the techniques of
Sections 2 and 3), and so the
webmaster of A can immediately take action to avert a dispute,
rather than wait until, say, the end of the month to find out that B
will not pay her.
Mike Reiter
7/21/1998