Next: Microbenchmarks
Up: CANS: Composable, Adaptive Network
Previous: Planning and Global Reconfiguration
Experience with Using CANS
We have been experimenting with a prototype CANS implementation on
Windows 2000 clients and Java capable intermediate hosts, which
currently emphasizes functionality and correctness over performance.
Both the execution environment (EE) and driver components are written
in Java. The interception layer described in
Section 3.4 makes use of the Detours
toolkit [11] to divert required application functions by
rewriting portions of the memory code image. To set up the plan, the
interception layer interacts with the plan manager on a distinguished
EE, which in turn builds the plan, partitions it, and downloads plan
fragments to individual environments. Interactions between different
EEs make use of Java/RMI. Data transmissions between components, which
are more performance critical, makes use of the communication adapters
described in Section 3.3.
In this section, we first describe microbenchmarks reflecting
overheads of using the CANS infrastructure, and then a larger case
study that evaluates its flexibility.
Figure 7:
Case study: MediaPlayer with CANS
infrastructure and the components added in each stage.
|
Subsections
Next: Microbenchmarks
Up: CANS: Composable, Adaptive Network
Previous: Planning and Global Reconfiguration
Weisong Shi
2001-01-08