Next: 5.3 Comparison of Basic
Up: 5 Evaluation Results
Previous: 5.1 Experimental Workloads
5.2 Evaluation Methodology
Table 6:
Logged data and static parameters for calculating energy consumption.
|
Total elapsed time in the system |
|
Total elapsed idle time in the system |
|
Total time that node j operates in Standby mode |
|
while process i is active |
|
Total time that node j operates in Nap mode |
|
while process i is active |
|
Activity factor of memory transactions3 |
|
Set of all processes in the system |
|
Power dissipation of a node in Read/Write mode |
|
Power dissipation of a node in Standby mode |
|
Power dissipation of a node in Nap mode |
|
Set of all nodes in the system |
|
Our PAVM implementation is currently fully operational, and has all the
means to communicate with the RDRAM memory controller (i82850 chipset)
on our Pentium 4 testbed to manage power by controlling the power state
of individual nodes. However, due to a hardware bug found in the
chipset [16], the system will hang when instructed to put a
node in Nap mode. As a result, this prevents us from directly measuring
the actual energy saved, e.g., with a digital power meter. However, by
logging detailed information about the state of processes and the state
of the system, combined with the information from memory device's
datasheet, we can calculate fairly accurately how much energy would be
consumed.
Specifically, to accurately calculate energy consumption, we need to
log the operating times and memory use characteristics shown in the
top portion of Table 6 from the running system. We also
need some static system/memory parameters, shown in the bottom portion
of Table 6, to complete the energy calculation.
Using these parameters, we can compute the energy consumed with the
following equation:
where or , depending on the power-management scheme
used (see next section). This equation consists of three terms. The first is
the energy consumed by the memory while the system is idle, and is
simply the product of the number of nodes, total idle time, and either
or , depending on whether the nodes are kept in Nap or
Standby modes when system is idle. The second term computes the energy for
keeping nodes in Nap and Standby modes while the system is not idle.
This is a double summation over all processes and all nodes, where we
weight the total time a particular process keeps a particular node in
Nap and Standby modes by and , respectively. The last term
reflects the additional energy required to actually read/write data
from/to a memory device in Standby mode, and is a product of the
total non-idle time,
the additional power dissipated in Read/Write mode over Standby, and an
activity factor, , that gives the total number of memory transactions
as a fraction of the maximum number possible when a device is kept
in Read/Write mode (i.e., peak memory bandwidth).
Next: 5.3 Comparison of Basic
Up: 5 Evaluation Results
Previous: 5.1 Experimental Workloads
2003-03-03