Next: U.S. versus Europe
Up: Effect of geographic location
Previous: Effect of geographic location
Multiple sources in different locations
We consider paths from sources in three geographically distributed
locations in the U.S.: Stanford, Washington University at St. Louis
(WUSTL), and the University of North Carolina (UNC). The destination
set is LibWeb, which is a larger and more diverse set than the
UnivHosts set considered in Section 4.1.2.
Figure 5:
CDF of distance ratio for paths from multiple sources to LibWeb.
|
As shown in Figure 5, the distance ratio tends
to be the smallest for paths originating from Stanford and the largest
for those originating from WUSTL. Stanford, like Berkeley, is located
in the San Francisco Bay area, which is well served by many of the
large ISPs with nationwide backbones. In contrast, WUSTL is much less
well connected. Almost all paths from WUSTL enter Verio's network in
St. Louis and then take a detour either to Chicago in the north or
Dallas in the south. At one of these cities, the path transitions to
another major ISP such as AT&T, Cable & Wireless, etc. and
proceeds to the destination. Any detour is particularly expensive
in terms of the distance ratio because the central location of
St. Louis in the U.S. means that the geographic distance to various
destinations is relatively small.
In general, paths (such as those from WUSTL) that traverse significant
distances in the backbones of two or more large ISPs tend to be more
circuitous than paths (such as those from Stanford) that traverse much
of the end-to-end distance in the backbone of a single ISP (regardless
of who the ISP is). One example of a highly circuitous path we found
involved two large ISPs, Verio and AT&T. The path originates in WUSTL
in St. Louis and terminates at a host in Indiana University, 328 km
away. However, the geographic path goes from St. Louis to New York via
Chicago, all on Verio's network. In New York, it transitions to
AT&T's network and then retraces its path back through Chicago to
St. Louis, before finally heading to Indiana. The linearized distance
is 3500 km, more than 10 times as much as the geographic distance. We
examine the impact of multiple ISPs in greater detail in Section
5.
While the specific findings pertaining to Stanford and WUSTL may not
be important in general, our results suggest that the distribution of
the distance ratio is consistent with our intuition about the richness
of connectivity of hosts in different geographic locations.
Next: U.S. versus Europe
Up: Effect of geographic location
Previous: Effect of geographic location
Lakshminarayanan Subramanian
2002-04-14