Check out the new USENIX Web site. next up previous
Next: Optimization 2: harbingers Up: Efficient update flooding Previous: Efficient update flooding


Optimization 1: delta propagation

A major drawback of flooding is that it propagates the entire file contents even when only one byte has been modified. Delta propagation improves the propagation efficiency while maintaining the logical simplicity of flooding. Here, whenever a portion of a file is changed (e.g., adding an entry to a directory), Pangaea propagates only a small, semantic description of the change, called a delta. Deltas, in general, must be applied in the same order to every replica to produce the same result. We ensure this by having each delta carry two timestamps: the old timestamp that represents the state of the replica just before the change, and the new timestamp that shows the state of the replica after the change [15]. A replica applies a delta only when its current timestamp matches the delta's old timestamp. Otherwise, it resorts to full contents transfer, with potential conflict resolution as described in Section 5.2. In practice, updates are handled almost exclusively by deltas, and full-state transfer happens only when there are concurrent writes, or when a node recovers from a crash.

Pangaea further reduces the size of updates by delta merging, akin to the feature implemented in Coda [20]. For example, when a file is deleted right after it is modified (which happens often for temporary files), the server quashes the modification if it has not yet been sent to other replicas. Delta merging is transparent to users because it adds no delay to propagation.


next up previous
Next: Optimization 2: harbingers Up: Efficient update flooding Previous: Efficient update flooding
Yasushi Saito 2002-10-08