Next:
Up: Kernel Mechanisms for Service
Previous: Conclusions and Future Work
- 1
-
``Cisco TCP intercept,'' https://www.cisco.com.
- 2
-
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishan,
``Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel,''
in , Jan. 1996.
- 3
-
P. Druschel and G. Banga,
``Lazy receiver processing (LRP): a network subsystem architecture
for server systems,''
in , Oct. 1996, pp. 91-105.
- 4
-
O. Spatscheck and L. Peterson,
``Defending against denial of service attacks in scout,''
in , Feb. 1999.
- 5
-
``Ensim corporation: virtual servers,'' https://www.ensim.com.
- 6
-
``Alteon web systems,'' https://www.alteonwebsystems.com.
- 7
-
``Cisco arrowpoint web network services,'' https://www.arrowpoint.com.
- 8
-
J. Almeida, M. Dabu, A. Manikutty, and P. Cao,
``Providing differentiated levels of service in web content
hosting,''
in , Mar. 1999.
- 9
-
T. Barzilai, D. Kandlur, A. Mehra, and D. Saha,
``Design and implementation of an rsvp based quality of service
architecture for an integrated services internet,''
, vol. 16, no.
3, pp. 397-413, Apr. 1998.
- 10
-
A. Mehra, R. Tewari, and D. Kandlur,
``Design considerations for rate control of aggregated tcp
connections,''
in , June 1999.
- 11
-
G.R. Wright and W.R. Stevens,
,
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995.
- 12
-
Martin F. Arlitt and Carey l. Williamson,
``Web server workload characterization: The search for invariants,''
in , Apr. 1996.
- 13
-
P.Joubert, R. King, R.Neves, M.Russinovich, and J.Tracey,
``High performance memory based web caches: Kernel and user space
performance,'' in preparation.
- 14
-
``Khttpd - linux http accelerator,'' https://www.fenrus.demon.nl/.
- 15
-
``webstone,'' https://www.mindcraft.com.
- 16
-
G. Banga and P. Druschel,
``Measuring the capacity of a web server,''
in , Dec. 1997.
- 17
-
``apache,'' https://www.apache.org.
- 18
-
L. Stein and D. MacEachern,
,
O'Reilly, 1999.
- 19
-
T. Abdelzaher and N. Bhatti,
``Web server qos management by adaptive content delivery,''
in , June 1999.
- 20
-
L. Cherkasova and P. Phaal,
``Session based admission control: a mechanism for improving the
performance of an overloaded web server,''
Tech. Rep., Hewlett Packard, 1999.
- 21
-
V. Kanodia and E. Knightly,
``Multi-class latency-bounded web servers,''
in , June 2000.
- 22
-
K. Li and S. Jamin,
``A measurement-based admission controlled web server,''
in , Mar. 2000.
- 23
-
Nina Bhatti and Rich Friedrich,
``Web server support for tiered services,''
, Sept. 1999.
- 24
-
M. E. Crovella, R. Frangioso, and M. Harchol-Balter,
``Connection scheduling in web servers,''
in , Oct. 1999.
- 25
-
J. Reumann, A. Mehra, K. Shin, and D. Kandlur,
``Virtual services: A new abstraction for server consolidation,''
in , June 2000.
- 26
-
H. Jamjoom and J. Reumann,
``Qguard:protecting internet servers from overload,''
Tech. Rep., University of Michigan, CSE-TR-427-00, 2000.
- 27
-
G. Banga, P. Druschel, and J. Mogul,
``Resource containers: a new facility for resource management in
server systems,''
in , Feb. 1999.
- 28
-
M. Aron, D. Sanders, P. Druschel, and W. Zwaenepoel,
``Scalable content-aware request distribution in cluster-based
network servers,''
in , June 2000.
- 29
-
D. Mosberger and L. L. Peterson,
``Making paths explicit in the scout operating system,''
in , Oct. 1996, pp. 153-167.
- 30
-
M. B. Jones, J. S. Barrera III, A. Forin, P. J. Leach, D. Rosu, and M. Rosu,
``An overview of the Rialto real-time architecture,''
in , Sept. 1996, pp. 249-256.
- 31
-
Thiemo Voigt and Bengt Ahlgren,
``Scheduling TCP in the Nemesis operating system,''
in , Aug. 1999.
Renu Tewari
2001-05-01