We performed a simple experiment to verify whether the actual bandwidth observed on the downlink from AP to an end-host compares with the estimated value obtained above. A UDP session is initiated from the AP to an affiliated end-host. The duration of the transfer was 200 seconds and the AP was constantly backlogged. The actual bandwidth from the AP to the end-host for the duration of the transfer was measured to be 4.3 Mbps, which closely agrees with the estimate obtained above.
In a second experiment, we place one AP and two wireless hosts and in the anechoic chamber. Host is affiliated to the AP. A UDP session is initiated from the AP to the host . The UDP session consists of CBR traffic generated at the rate of 100 packets/second, each packet of size 576 bytes (640 bytes including the headers). Another host is configured in ``monitor'' mode and records the delays observed for the beacon frames (beacons numbered 300 and higher in Figure 3). The monitoring host estimates the mean beacon delay from the AP over the duration of the UDP transfer to be . Using our bandwidth estimation methodology, estimates the potential bandwidth from the AP to itself to be 3.74 Mbps. We then affiliate with the AP and initiate another UDP session between the AP and host , simultaneously with the UDP session between the AP and . The AP is always backlogged with packets for . The actual bandwidth from the AP to is measured to be 4.06 Mbps, which agrees with the potential bandwidth estimate of 3.74 Mbps, obtained by prior to affiliation with the AP. Thus, the experimental results suggest that our approach is promising.