BIR and LIR measured 5 days apart

We used the same settings as the baseline scenario, but did only the broadcast experiments. We compare $BIR$ calculated from these experiments with the $LIR$ measured in the baseline experiment. The two experiments were done 5 days apart. The CDF of absolute error is shown in Figure 6. The graph also shows the baseline error CDF (labeled ``Back-to-back''') for comparison purposes. We see that $BIR$ is still generally a good predictor of $LIR$, but as expected, the error is somewhat higher compared to the baseline (back-to-back) case. The median error is only 0.01, and mean is 0.049. The results show that even in a static environment like ours, the interference patterns are slightly different at different times. The need to repeat interference measurements underscores the need for an inexpensive experimental methodology to measure interference.