Next: Base-level
reasoning Up:
Polus Framework Previous: Reasoning
Input: The current state and the goals
being violated.
Output: The components whose behavior needs to change and the type of
change. This is expressed as a query of the form:
|
|
Approach: Problem determination has been an area of ongoing research. We briefly describe a simplified approach to illustrate how problem determination, base-reasoning and meta-reasoning work together.
In the SAN file system example, by analyzing the invocation path (i.e. client machine, controller, disks), we determine that disks are saturated (i.e. the current I/O rate is the maximum they can support). Furthermore, a change analysis with a previous state reveals that client I/O request rate has increased by 40% and that the sequential/random ratio of the workload has changed from to . Based on the problem determination analysis the following two queries get generated: Query 1: Select an action that improves the throughput of the disks by 25% (the fact that it is saturated will show-up in the preconditions of actions). Query 2: Select an action that improves the throughput of the (controller or client machine) by 25%, and is optimized for sequential workloads.
Next: Base-level reasoning Up:
Polus Framework
Previous: Reasoning